Piotroski chose nine fundamental signals to measure three areas of the firm's financial condition: profitability, financial leverage/liquidity, and operating efficiency. In this article I will show how this method works out for Weyco Group Inc, a dividend champion which paid dividends for over 30 years. This stock came up in one of my screeners and I was curious to see how the fundamentals look.
Result: 1 point
3. Higher return on assets
Result: 0 points
5. Lower ratio of long term debt
Piotroski gives one point to this variable if the company's leverage ratio fell relative to the previous year, and zero if it rose.
1. Return on Assets
Net income before extraordinary items, one point awarded if positive, zero otherwise. If the firm's ROA is positive, the indicator variable is equal to one, zero otherwise.
Table 1 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Net Income | $18,96 | $15,25 | $13,67 | million |
Total Assets | $285,32 | $273,51 | $223,44 | million |
Return on Assets | 6,6% | 5,6% | 6,1% | % |
Result: 1 point
2. Operating cash flow
It's important a company has positive cash flow! Positive operating cash flow in the current year gives 1 point.
Table 2 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Operating cash flow | $17,99 | $17,14 | $0,11 | million |
Result: 1 point
3. Higher return on assets
Higher return on assets in the current period compared to the ROA in the previous year gives 1 point. From the table at section 1, return on assets is 6.6% in 2012, compared tot 5.6% in 2011.
Result: 1 point
Result: 1 point
4. Cash flow from operations are greater than ROA
This is used because in 1996, Sloan showed that earnings driven by positive accrual adjustments (i.e., profits are greater than cash flow from operations) is a bad signal about future profitability and returns.Table 4 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Net income less extraordinary items | $18,96 | $15,25 | $13,67 | million |
Operating cash flow | $17,99 | $17,14 | $0,11 | million |
Result: 0 points
5. Lower ratio of long term debt
Piotroski gives one point to this variable if the company's leverage ratio fell relative to the previous year, and zero if it rose.
Table 5 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Total Assets | $285,32 | $273,51 | $223,44 | million |
Long-term debt | $- | $- | $- | million |
Ratio | 0% | 0% | 0% | % |
WEYS carries no long-term debt, but does have short-term debt (to be clear).
Result: 1 point (even though technically, the ratio did not improve...)
6. Higher current ratio
This variable measures the historical change in the firm's current ratio between the current and prior year. Improvement in liquidity adds one point to the score, because it is a good sign of the company's ability to service current debt obligations, zero points if the current ratio decreased.
Table 6 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Current Assets | $146,44 | $128,23 | $111,49 | million |
Current Liabilities | $70,02 | $64,90 | $27,71 | million |
Current Ratio | 209% | 198% | 402% | % |
Result: 1 point
7. Outstanding shares
Companies that raise external capital could be signaling their inability to generate sufficient internal funds to service future obligations. This indicator variable will equal one if the company did not issue common equity the previous year, zero if it did.
Table 7 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Outstanding shares | 10,83 | 10,92 | 11,36 | million |
Result: 1 point
8. Higher gross margin
The firm's current gross margin ratio is calculated as follows: (revenue - cost of goods sold) / revenue. An improvement in margins signifies a potential improvement in factor costs, a reduction of inventory costs, or a rise in the price of the firm's product. Table 8 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Revenue | $293,47 | $271,10 | $229,23 | million |
Cost of goods sold | $178,58 | $164,38 | $138,93 | million |
Gross margin | 39,1% | 39,4% | 39,4% | % |
Result: 0 points (although the difference is quite small!)
9. Higher asset turnover ratio
The firm's current year asset turnover ratio (sales/beginning of the year assets) less the prior year's asset turnover ratio. An improvement in asset turnover signifies greater productivity from the asset base. This can come from more efficient operations (fewer assets generate the same amount of sales) or an increase in sales, which could also signify improved market conditions for the company's products.Table 9 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sales / revenue | $293,47 | $271,10 | $229,23 | million |
Beginning of the year's assets | $273,52 | $223,44 | $207,14 | million |
Asset Turnover ratio | 107,3% | 121,3% | 110,7% | % |
Result: 0 points
Summary
Weyco Group Inc scores 6 points on Piotroski's method to evaluate shares. While this is a nice performance, there probably are stocks out there with better scores. So for now, I'll keep Weyco on my watchlist to see if they improve their operating efficiency this year.
Weyco Group Inc scores 6 points on Piotroski's method to evaluate shares. While this is a nice performance, there probably are stocks out there with better scores. So for now, I'll keep Weyco on my watchlist to see if they improve their operating efficiency this year.
Profitability
|
Points
|
---|---|
1. Return on Assets | 1 |
2. Operating cash flow | 1 |
3. Higher return on assets | 1 |
4. Cash flow from operations are greater than ROA | 0 |
Leverage, Liquidity and Source of Funds
|
Points
|
5. Lower ratio of long term debt | 1 |
6. Higher current ratio | 1 |
7. Outstanding shares | 1 |
Operating Efficiency
|
Points
|
8. Higher gross margin | 0 |
9. Higher asset turnover ratio | 0 |
Total score
|
6 points
|
Do you use Piotroski's method to evaluate shares? Let me know!
PM: I've corrected table 9 because I used the wrong values for revenue.
No comments:
Post a Comment